All About Love Official Blog
The official blog for our site
What makes a good writing class?
“As for myself,” says Stephen King in his wonderful book On Writing, “I’m doubtful about writing classes, but not entirely against them.” What I want to insist on in this article is that writing classes – or seminars, or workshops, or writing circles, call ‘em what you will – can be
• Inspirational
• Motivational, and
• A spur to action and
that Mr King would do well to approach the subject a tad less sceptically.
Our experience as facilitators of such groups - both online and face to face - suggests that if a number of cautions are borne in mind, writers can derive real, practical value – and have one hell of a lot of fun as they go – from writing seminars. Whether you’re a writing instructor – or a writer contemplating the mountain of your first major writing project – these pointers can help.
Here are the cautions for face to face groups:
• Get the size of your group right. We’ve found that less than six is too small, more than twelve unmanageable.
• Make sure the individual members of the group are more or less on the same rung of the skills level.
• Get the composition of the group right. A good mix makes for the best and most productive discussions. One recent group we guided featured a talk show host, a dedicated environmentalist, an IT entrepreneur, a midwife and a publisher. Each was in the process of writing a book – both fiction and non-fiction – or on the brink of starting.
The same cautions don’t apply to online groups. Interactive groups, with discussion forums and contact and feedback with facilitators, can work well with any number of people, all at different skill levels - and from different sides of the earth. (Isn’t nature wonderful!)
And here’s what great workshops, whether online or face to face, should do:
• Workshops should provide solid intellectual stimulation. Something for the participants to get their teeth into. Something designed to be useful to them in the writing process. Something practical. How to choose the most appropriate point of view. The nuts and bolts of creating memorable characters. How to structure scenes. How to add steel and fibre to avoid a sagging middle.
• Workshops should be structured around a series of challenging writing exercises. Challenging, that is, but not so hard as to be intimidating. Exercises need to be fun. People should be dying to try them. They enable wannabe writers to apply their new skills to the sort of problems they’ll face as they drive their projects forward. (And, in our experience, they love doing them!)
• Participants should work in an atmosphere of creative freedom, where they are encouraged to share their problems and their achievements.
Finally, what we’ve learned is that a relaxed but focused approach yields the greatest results. And nothing helps that as much as a bottle of soft red wine to wind up the evening. Of course, this isn’t necessarily a universal truth, but it’s worked for us. And perhaps that’s why Stephen King’s a little jaundiced. He’s on the wagon, poor sod.
That’s the only difference between face to face and online courses. There’s no cyber-wine. (Of course, there’s nothing stopping you opening your own wee bottle and toasting us somewhere out there, wherever you are. For the rest though, our online courses have the same advice, which we try to present in the same personal style, sharing our experiences and the mistakes we’ve made along the way. We hope participants will get to know us through our various courses, and feel they’re in conversation with us. We give feedback and interaction, just as we would to our face to face groups, and participants can get to know their fellow writers and share problems and experiences.
Richard Beynon and Jo-Anne Richards run online romance writing courses on allaboutlove.net and face-to-face writing courses in Johannesburg.
Read On Writing by Stephen King
Comments
1
Having done both a writers’ circle course and an online course with Richard and Jo-Anne, I have to disagree with Stephen King. (After all, he’s unlikely to benefit from a class of any sort at this stage, is he? While one might well have the talent to write a book deep down inside (some deeper than others), sometimes you need a little help getting it all out and onto the page; a little guidance is always helpful.
Firstly, I found the ‘theory’ or course content of both to be immensely beneficial. Other books I’ve read on the subject have not been as practical and clear about issues like plot, structure, character and so on. And so, from a purely informational point of view, the courses are very solid, and have plenty of depth. Also, having done the face-to-face course first I expected repetition when I did the online course and found that there was very little. I learnt something new each time I logged on.
In both cases I also found the exercises enormously helpful. I firmly believe that one learns far more from doing something than from simply reading about it. And each time I tackled an exercise, despite suffering from paroxysms of self-doubt, I surprised myself with what I produced.
I’ve been a journalist for about 15 years now, so I can do non-fiction fairly easily. I wasn’t so sure I was cut out for fiction. The exercises showed me that with a bit of practice and a lot of hard work, I might well crack this fiction lark one day! And in fact, I’ve fallen head over heels in love with it, and would give up the journalism in a heartbeat if I didn’t need it to pay the rent. My brain is brimming over with ideas for all kinds of books.
The value of a face-to-face, writers’ circle kind of course is the feedback you get from other writers. It’s a friendly, non-threatening, dynamic environment (or at least it was in our case), where you throw out your ideas and they are thrown back at you—for better or worse. It’s a safe place to test your work, and often, just the process of sharing it with others helps you to see the flaws and find those areas that need work. And the brainstorming! It’s marvellous. You might only use one throw-away comment by someone else, but it’s usually gold. And then you get to do the same for others.
The online course is wonderful because you can work through it at your own pace, and often at odd hours—I sometimes worked on exercises inbetween stories for my ‘real’ job, or late at night when I couldn’t sleep. You can log on at 2am or 2pm, and the course is there, no jacket required. You can also have a couple of stabs at the exercises before submitting them. You can cut and add and refine things if you so desire, or you can simply dash something off and submit it straight away. The flexibility really appealed to me. Of course, you can’t share a good bottle of red wine online, but that’s a minor inconvenience!
Finally, on both courses I found that I got fantastically constructive feedback from Richard and Jo-Anne. It’s so rare that people who are good at what they do are prepared to share their expertise in this way. Feedback is always honest, but kind, which leaves you feeling hopeful and more inspired to keep on keeping on. Which is just the kind of inspiration I need.
Richard and Jo-Anne are great teachers and mentors; I can only conclude that Mr King has simply been attending the wrong classes.


