<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>All About Love &amp;ndash; Columns &amp;ndash; Writing Quips and Tips</title>
    <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>alissa@allaboutlove.net</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2011</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2011-10-05T13:32:00+02:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Writing and rewriting &#45; it&#8217;s now or never</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/writing_and_rewriting_its_now_or_never/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/writing_and_rewriting_its_now_or_never/#When:03:09:00Z</guid>
      <description>I recently read that, before he begins a new novel, EL Doctorow writes 60&#45;or&#45;so pages of dialogue between his main characters &#8211; then throws them away and starts again.

I don&#8217;t know how he does it. It must break his heart. But I do understand why.
 
Having just finished a rough draft of a new novel, I have been giving him a lot of thought lately &#8211; and wishing I had his discipline (not to mention his talent).

 Reading my manuscript from beginning to end, I can see how the voice of the protagonist, and the novel as a whole, develops as I gain confidence. At the start, my protagonist is a tentative being, just drawing her first breaths in the world I gave her. By the end, she is more confident in her skin. She speaks and reacts in a way that is more true to who she is.</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-10-18T03:09:00+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Writing about it is a lot like having it</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/writing_about_it_is_a_lot_like_having_it/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/writing_about_it_is_a_lot_like_having_it/#When:04:41:00Z</guid>
      <description>If you&#8217;re self&#45;conscious about sex in real life, you&#8217;ll be so on the page. You&#8217;ll hide coyly behind the frills of metaphor. 

And if you&#8217;re over&#45;confident, you&#8217;re likely to charge at the task and batter it with clinical description. Either way you&#8217;ll be cringy. 

Since we were on the subject of sex in literature, (Last week&#8217;s blog on why no one writes about sex anymore), it occurred to me that sex in life is a lot like sex on the page. And learning to write about it can show us quite a lot about having it.</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-09-20T04:41:00+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Plunging and grinding doesn&#8217;t make a story</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/plunging_and_grinding_doesnt_make_a_story/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/plunging_and_grinding_doesnt_make_a_story/#When:04:36:00Z</guid>
      <description>A judge for this year&#8217;s Booker prize, commenting on the state of the British and Commonwealth novel, said no one was writing much about sex anymore.

&#8220;It&#8217;s as if they were paranoid about being nominated for the Bad Sex Award,&#8221; he said. He was referring to the now famous, and little wanted award by the Literary Review. He added that &#8220;a lot of people&#8221; were writing about &#8220;taking drugs, as if that was a substitute for sex&#8221;.

The Bad Sex Awards were inaugurated in 1993 in order to draw attention to, &#8220;and hopefully discourage&#8221;, poorly written, redundant or crude sex in fiction. The intention, they say is &#8220;not to humiliate&#8221;.

That might not be their intention, but it must be absolutely mortifying even to be nominated.&amp;nbsp; Yet I wonder if it is the Bad Sex Award that&#8217;s discouraging sex scenes.</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-09-13T04:36:00+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Characters &#45; in life and on the page</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/characters_in_life_and_on_the_page/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/characters_in_life_and_on_the_page/#When:04:46:00Z</guid>
      <description>There&#8217;s a story about a novelist whose characters borrowed heavily from life. He wrote a moving account of a family dominated by an overbearing matriarch.

He was most concerned about his mother&#8217;s reaction. Would she forgive him? Would it split the family, and make him an outcast?

Shortly after it appeared, his mother summoned him. Sweaty palmed, he appeared to receive her judgment.</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-09-06T04:46:00+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>It&#8217;s hard and lonely &#45; and Oprah&#8217;s unlikely to be involved</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/its_hard_and_lonely_and_oprahs_unlikely_to_be_involved/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/its_hard_and_lonely_and_oprahs_unlikely_to_be_involved/#When:04:32:00Z</guid>
      <description>People have funny ideas about creative writing. 

Either, they believe anyone capable of stringing two words together can put together a 90 000&#45;word novel.&amp;nbsp; (&#8220;She writes really good proposals / sales documents /memorandums&#8221;.) If they just put their mind to it.

&#8220;If only we had the time you do.&#8221; (Spoken with a rueful sigh.)

Or: &#8220;Old Jimbo&#8217;s retiring in September. He&#8217;s going to write his book. 
That&#8217;ll keep him busy for October, but what he&#8217;ll do from November I&#8217;m just not sure.&#8221;</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-08-30T04:32:00+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Genre doesn&#8217;t dictate quality</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/genre_doesnt_dictate_quality/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/genre_doesnt_dictate_quality/#When:04:24:00Z</guid>
      <description>I recently saw this brilliant response to a criticism of chick lit. Michelle Gormon is a chick lit writer herself, published by Penguin. Her article appeared in The Guardian.

&#8220;Critics cite many reasons in their dismissal of the genre, reasons that ostensibly aren&#8217;t rooted in literary snobbery. &#8216;The problem&#8217; with chick&#45;lit, I&#8217;m told, is that it doesn&#8217;t deal with the real issues that women face. Well actually, some of it does. From sibling rivalry to infidelity, addictions to poor body image, a woman can take her pick within the genre if she wants to. And the rest of it? It&#8217;s meant for pure indulgent enjoyment, and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that.

&#8220;But why insist that chick&#45;lit reflect the issues facing its readership when no other genre is measured by the same yardstick? It isn&#8217;t expected of science fiction, crime, mystery, historical fiction, or even most literary fiction. Women didn&#8217;t flock to buy We Need to Talk About Kevin thinking, &#8216;Gosh, my son is in prison too for picking off his classmates with a crossbow. That&#8217;s the book for me.&#8217;</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-08-23T04:24:00+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Imagination doesn&#8217;t negate the truth</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/imagination_doesnt_negate_the_truth/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/imagination_doesnt_negate_the_truth/#When:04:15:01Z</guid>
      <description>Writers are a lot like actors.

They need to be able to draw on their own experiences to understand others. And to  express these in a compelling way that enables their audience (or readers) to believe in them. 

Just to draw out last week&#8217;s theme a little more, this means that writers &#8211; novelists and non&#45;fiction writers &#8211;are equally in the business of seeking out the truth.

Just because novelists use their imagination, doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re not exploring their inner selves, and their time and place in history. 
Gabriel Garcia Marquez says: &#8220;There&#8217;s not a single line in all my work that does not have a basis in reality.&#8221;&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-08-16T04:15:01+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Fiction isn&#8217;t falsehood, and history isn&#8217;t truth</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/fiction_isnt_falsehood_and_history_isnt_truth/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/fiction_isnt_falsehood_and_history_isnt_truth/#When:01:06:00Z</guid>
      <description>&#8220;Fact&#8221; is trendy. 

Non&#45;fiction sells more than fiction. And when you talk to people about reading, they will often declare sternly that they prefer to &#8220;read facts&#8221;. They want to &#8220;learn&#8221; or &#8220;improve&#8221;, or whatever.

In fact, there&#8217;s not as much difference between the two as you might think.</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-08-09T01:06:00+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Reading as construction work</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/reading_as_construction_work/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/reading_as_construction_work/#When:00:47:00Z</guid>
      <description>If writing is a blueprint which we, as readers, turn into cathedrals or palaces, then isn&#8217;t it also a route map?</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-08-02T00:47:00+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>There&#8217;s nothing passive about reading</title>
      <link>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/theres_nothing_passive_about_reading/</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutlove.net/index.php/columns/entry/theres_nothing_passive_about_reading/#When:00:42:00Z</guid>
      <description>Reading is not a one&#45;way process. It&#8217;s far more active than a writer imparting and a reader receiving.

The way to get the most from any reading experience is to accept that readers bring as much to the book as writers do. 

As readers, we bring a complete psychological engagement to the task. That&#8217;s why movies of books we&#8217;ve read are never satisfying. Someone else has filled in the holes &#8211; and not as satisfyingly as we did.

Reading is construction work. The writer provides sketchy, incomplete blueprints so that each reader can build a different world.&amp;nbsp; 
Writer Alberto Manguel calls it the&quot;intelligent and inspired reconstruction &#8230; using reason and imagination &#8230; to translate it on to a different canvas, extending the horizon of its apparent meaning beyond &#8230; the declared intentions of the author&#8221;.</description>
      <dc:subject>Writing Quips and Tips</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-07-26T00:42:00+02:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
